The Sound and Fury of the PrEP Debate

viewimage story.php  The Sound and Fury of the PrEP Debate

When the drug Truvada achieved FDA approval in July of 2012 as a medication to prevent HIV infection among people who are negative (a strategy known as pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP), it’s as if the ghosts of naysayers from the 60’s rose from their resting places, delighted and re-energized and began drilling their mid-century objections into the hearts and minds of contemporary society.

Maybe proponents of PrEP like myself believed the response to the drug would be more enthusiastic. Surely anyone who lived through the horror of early AIDS would thank God that a new prevention strategy exists that doesn’t rely upon condoms alone. The fury of the response has been a little startling to me.

Fortunately, Facebook groups and online sites that explain the facts about PrEP are springing up everywhere to address misinformation and to clarify legitimate areas of concern. Here are the most persistent objections to PrEP, and the facts as we know them.

People wouldn’t need PrEP if they would use condoms. They just want to bareback.

RELATED ARTICLE:

Will HIV Ever be Safe Enough for You?

Studies show that people on PrEP do not have an increase in high risk sexual behavior, but cynics have visions of wanton orgies ahead worthy …read more    

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *